Instead a supposed 'expert' in copyrights violations, under the name karmafist yesterday deleted the temp page WITH NO EXPLANATION AT ALL. page on ID which has little relation to the old one and consequently to the one in Routledge. Then, the webmaster of the ID webpage wrote to you and explained that there was no such violation as he has the copyrights for all the contents of his webpage. I watched the Administrators' behaviour with respect to the Inclusive Democracy (ID) entry and I could only characterise it as a perfect example of authoritarianism mixed with ignorance.įirst, you discovered possible copyright violation in the ID entry with respect to the corresponding entry in the Inclusive webpage and the relevant Routledge Encyclopedia entry.
Why the pornographic entry, which stayed here for over an hour, left no trace at all in the history page? But, even if this vandalising entry somehow did not leave any trace in the History page surely it left its trace in your monitors and therefore you know the IP of the vandaliser. It is well known that every entry here (or anywhere in Wikipedia for that matter) leaves its trace in the History page. Comment We demand that wiki administrators trace the IP so we can find out who vandalized the page with pornography! User:john sargis 8:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC).
SHOULDN'T SOMEONE SEARCH WHO DID IT?- TheVel 13:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC) SOMEBODY VANDALIZED THE PAGE JUST BEFORE WITH A PORNIGRAPHIC PICTURE. This has nothing to do with the original one which was based on the corresponding Routledge entry and caused the copy vio. I uploaded a modified version of the Inclusive Democracy entry.
0 kommentar(er)
